This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0269216308095701v1 22/8/895    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hjermstad, M J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hjermstad, M J Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Pain assessment tools in palliative care: an urgent need for consensus

¹ Department of Oncology, Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo; Pain and Palliation Research Group, Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim
² Palliative Medicine Department, Bristol Haematology & Oncology Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol
³ Pain and Palliation Research Group, Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim; Regional Centre of Excellence for Palliative Care, Western Norway, Haukeland University Hospital, Haukeland
⁴ Palliative Care (Pain Therapy – Rehabilitation) Fondazione IRCCS National Cancer Institute of Milan, Milan
⁵ National Resource Centre for Studies on Long-term Effects after Cancer, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Rikshospitalet
⁶ Pain and Palliation Research Group, Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim
⁷ Department of Oncology, Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo; Pain and Palliation Research Group, Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim; Palliative Medicine Department, Bristol Haematology & Oncology Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol; Regional Centre of Excellence for Palliative Care, Western Norway, Haukeland University Hospital, Haukeland; Palliative Care (Pain Therapy – Rehabilitation) Fondazione IRCCS National Cancer Institute of Milan, Milan; National Resource Centre for Studies on Long-term Effects after Cancer, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Rikshospitalet

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

	Abstract

At present, there is no universally accepted cancer pain assessment tool for use in palliative care (PC). The European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC), therefore, aims to develop an international consensus-based computerised pain assessment tool. As part of this process, we have performed (1) a literature review on pain assessment tools for use in the PC and (2) an international expert survey to gain information on the relevant dimensions for pain assessment in PC. 230 publications were identified, only six met the inclusion criteria. Three further articles were identified through manual searching, totalling 11 different pain assessment tools. Nine tools were multidimensional. Pain intensity was assessed in seven, using various numerical/verbal rating scales (NRS/VRS); five tools focused on pain management. Three publications did not identify the rationale for the need to develop a new tool, and the selection procedure for items/dimensions was not described in six tools. Patient and/or professional expert groups were involved in the development of five tools and only two tools were extensively validated or cross-culturally tested. Thirty-two experts (71%) completed the expert survey and identified ‘intensity', ‘temporal pattern', ‘relief/exacerbation', ‘pain quality' and ‘location' as the five most relevant dimensions. Most preferred assessment of ‘pain intensity' was by NRS rather than VRS. Time windows extending 24 h were regarded as less relevant. Development of PC pain assessment tools seems to be a continuous process, which does not adhere to systematic guidelines, thus does not contribute to a universally accepted tool. No tool contained all relevant dimensions as defined by the experts. Many tools focused on particular dimensions, suggesting that specific research interests may drive the tool development process. Extensive literature reviews, expert and patient input and clinical studies are a needed approach in the development of a new consensus-based pain assessment tool.

Key Words: cancer, pain, pain assessment, palliative care

First published on September 17, 2008, doi:10.1177/0269216308095701

Palliative Medicine 2008;22:895.

A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?